Actually, I did a search before bothering to post this to see whether anyone had pointed it out yet (no sense in being redundant, right?). I found a lot of posts related to "good", but nothing with this particular phrasing.
AcolyteIn reply to Re: Re: URL Tomfoolery
by Acolyte
in thread URL Tomfoolery
by Acolyte
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |