Which is exactly why the original goto suggestion is about the only one that works and is concise enough to read. I don't see any other obvious ones. I'd often hash something like this but that wouldn't allow for easy emulation of the fall throughs in the C code.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Eek! goto?
by steves
in thread Eek! goto?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |