I recently ran Benchmark on some of my code and am curious as to how best to look at the results.
In the follwing code $link is an object which can be loaded from the database or the cache using the two private functions benchmarked and $criteria is a hashhref.
Update:
use Benchmark qw(cmpthese);
cmpthese( 10_000,
{
'From Cache' => sub{ $link->_load_from_database( $criteria ); },
' From DBI' => sub{ $link->_load_from_cache ( $criteria ); }
}
);
The results of the benchmarking are:use Benchmark qw(cmpthese); cmpthese( 10_000, { 'From Cache' => sub{ $link->_load_from_cache ( $criteria ); } +, ' From DBI' => sub{ $link->_load_from_database( $criteria ); } } );
As you can see the Cache code is much faster at 1314/sec (DBI is 660/sec). However the wall clock times for both are the same, and as 10_000 iterations were timed this would imply that in user time there is not much to choose between them.Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of From DBI, From Cache... From DBI: 16 wallclock secs (13.66 usr + 1.50 sys = 15.16 CPU) @ 65 +9.63/s (n=10000) From Cache: 16 wallclock secs ( 6.86 usr + 0.75 sys = 7.61 CPU) @ 13 +14.06/s (n=10000) Rate From DBI From Cache From DBI 660/s -- -50% From Cache 1314/s 99% --
My question is "how should I look at these results?". What generally accounts for time that Benchmark does not see, and which time result should I use in making performance questions. I hope that this is enough detail for a general discussion as opposed to specifically looking at the code I posted.
-- tidiness is the memory loss of environmental mnemonics
Update per author - dvergin 2003-02-12
In reply to Interpreting Benchmark results. by EvdB
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |