There are several reasons not to use "do" that way. First, from the perldoc man page:

...code evaluated with do FILENAME doesn't see lexicals in the enclosing scope like eval STRING does.

In other words, your "$thing_file_dot_inc_needs" variable won't work. Here's another flaw:

...it does reparse the file every time you call it...

It would be better to make the "file.inc" into a module and bring it in with a "use" or "require". Then you are protected from double-inclusion. Lastly, "do" is a heavily-overloaded keyword, also used for loops and subroutines, so it makes the program less clear, IMHO.

In reply to Re: Some Advice On Eval()-ing code. by tall_man
in thread Some Advice On Eval()-ing code. by Anonymous Monk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.