Update: tye is absolutely right in his answer. My auto-answer below was written before seeing it. Still, tye++.
The power of this monastery is incredible. After posting my question and getting a nice night of sleep, inspiration came to me. It turns out that the real problem, was the time() at which I wrote that code.
Anyhow, the piece of code below (based on the one posted above) illustrates how to correctly use flock() to acquire exclusive access on a file. As a hint, always try to lock the same file from all your processes :)
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use IO::File; use Fcntl qw(:flock); our $lock_file = 'test_lck'; # Get rid of our garbage END { unlink $lock_file; }; our %fh; my $id = 'A'; my $pid; my $buf = 'nothing'; $|++; # Spawn one helpful kid... while (($pid = fork()) == -1) { sleep 2; } unless ($pid) { # This is our child ++ $id; END {}; my $fh = new IO::File "$lock_file", O_RDWR | O_CREAT or die "Failed to open $lock_file: $!\n"; print "$id: about to lock...\n"; unless (flock($fh, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB)) { die "$id: Failed to acquire lock: $!\n"; } print "$id: done\n"; print "$id: wrote\n"; $fh->syswrite("$id\n", 3); print "$id: seeked\n"; $fh->seek(0, 0); sleep 3; print "$id: read\n"; $fh->sysread($buf, 3); chomp $buf; print "$id: got <$buf>\n"; flock($fh, LOCK_UN); $fh->close; exit 0; } my $fh = new IO::File "$lock_file", O_RDWR | O_CREAT or die "Failed to open $lock_file: $!\n"; print "$id: about to lock...\n"; if (flock($fh, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB)) { print "$id: done\n"; print "$id: wrote\n"; $fh->syswrite("$id\n", 3); print "$id: seeked\n"; $fh->seek(0, 0); print "$id: read\n"; $fh->sysread($buf, 3); sleep 2; chomp $buf; print "$id: got <$buf>\n"; flock($fh, LOCK_UN); } else { print "$id: Failed to acquire lock: $!\n"; } $fh->close; wait(); # Collect our child status exit 0;
This now produces the expected output in my system:
bash-2.05a$ ./flock-test.pl B: about to lock... B: done B: wrote B: seeked A: about to lock... A: Failed to acquire lock: Resource temporarily unavailable B: read B: got <B>
Thanks a lot to the monks that read my post.
-lem, but some call me fokat
In reply to Re: Testing flock
by fokat
in thread Testing flock
by fokat
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |