Your probably right.
I keep thinking to myself that given the right set of limited permissions for a specifically set up userid with no read/write/execute access outside a download/build directory created specifically for each given download and destroyed immediately after the PPM is built, it ought not be a security risk. That said, the only time I set up anything similar (under NT, I wouldn't have a clue under *nix) the aim was prevention of accidents rather protection from deliberate attack.
Oh well. Another transient thought bites the dust:)
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
The 7th Rule of perl club is -- pearl clubs are easily damaged. Use a diamond club instead.
In reply to Re: Re2: The quest for pure perl
by BrowserUk
in thread The quest for pure perl
by rinceWind
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |