Let me put that last point another way. My programming services cost more per week than a top-of-the-line linux server. People like merlyn and others cost at least twice that. Is it worth it to you for me to spend 40 hours figuring out how to save a meg of RAM?

Huh? Where did that come from? Fourty hours to find and fix a single small issue? If I spent an entire five-hour shift fixing some little thing like that, I'd feel like I didn't get anything done that day. In a thirty-hour work week, I could rewrite the application from scratch and have time left over to unstick printers, bug the APCC tech support people about our ongoing PowerChute issue, teach an Introduction to the Internet class to a group of senior citizens, reboot my coworkers' Windows systems for them as necessary ("I restarted it. It should be better now."), run a couple of custom reports for my boss (and write one-off Perl scripts to turn them into meaningful data), and redo the stylesheets for the cgi scripts in question just because I felt like it.

Either we're talking about programs so different in size that it's not remotely meaningful to talk about them in the same conversation (as I suspected when I read your previous message upthread), or else one of is seriously mispaid (since I don't make anything like the kind of wage you are talking about).

I said that for complex situations the nested structures are better, but it seems to me that deeply complex programs are the only kind you are willing to concede might ever exist. Take a deep breath; some of us do simple stuff sometimes.


sub H{$_=shift;while($_){$c=0;while(s/^2//){$c++;}s/^4//;$ v.=(' ','|','_',"\n",'\\','/')[$c]}$v}sub A{$_=shift;while ($_){$d=hex chop;for(1..4){$pl.=($d%2)?4:2;$d>>=1}}$pl}$H= "16f6da116f6db14b4b0906c4f324";print H(A($H)) # -- jonadab

In reply to Re: Parallel structures are NOT maintainable by jonadab
in thread using references as keys in a hash. by habit_forming

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.