The format is JPG which should have no bearing in the ultimate file size. I guess what I'm trying to determine is the difference between Sample and Scale. The Image Magick website says that Sample scales an image with pixel sampling. This leads me to believe there should be a reduction in the number of pixels and ultimately the file size. Is this true? I've resampled images in photo editors before (i.e. Image Expert) and successfully reduced a file size from 300k to 40k without compromizing web photo quality. Again, I am not reducing the image size just the file size.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

David K.

In reply to Re: Re: Image Magick - Sample vs. Scale by db2admin
in thread Image Magick - Sample vs. Scale by db2admin

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.