I agree with your suggestion that locally disabling "strict" is a better approach than cleverly circumventing it. Exposes the intent of the code more clearly.
That's what I used to do with Lint as well. Better to dumb down the warnings locally than to invent special variables to satisfy its artificial complaints. With your help though, I can see what the author intended here. Thanks.
In reply to Re: Re: Making -w happy
by chantstophacking
in thread Making -w happy
by chantstophacking
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |