I wrote CGI::Simple because I don't want/like the html output stuff and found the guts of CGI.pm to be somewhat convoluted. Same interfaces,full cgi-lib.pl support (which CGI.pm does not have), solid use of cgi_error() plus some different security related defaults and (IMHO) better docs. See CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?
I almost invariably use templates for HTML myself.
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
In reply to Re: To CGI or not CGI, that is the question
by tachyon
in thread To CGI or not CGI, that is the question
by Massyn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |