I think it was a less than ideal choice for the author of Winamp::Control to create a Winamp:: namespace. I'd go for Audio::Winamp::Control; maybe in your case Audio::Winamp::Control::Direct.
Rationale:
In reply to Re: Good package name for Winamp module?
by crenz
in thread Good package name for Winamp module?
by Ionizor
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |