Aristotle,
Thanks for the '-1' pointer. I wasn't aware of it.
I still have to check my coriginal code because with it I am splitting with a large limit value but am still having the issue of misrepresented array size for arrays generated by split. I will look into my code this AM and report back to the monks to clarify what I find to be the source (programmer -me- error or odd behaviour).
Clearly probabilities lean towards the former.
hackmare.
In reply to Re: Re^3: find real length of an array
by hackmare
in thread find real length of an array
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |