Well, we'll have to disagree about the clarity of the command paragraphs then. The interior sequences might be problematic, but other than complex L<>s and E<> they're easy to ignore. In plaintext, you can't represent references directly anyway; the same solutions you come up with there are likely to work for POD as simple L<>s.
I did say "in the absence of a POD parser" when I said you can read POD using a pager.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^4: POD as a general documentation system (yes, pod _is_ readable)
by Aristotle
in thread POD as a general documentation system
by robartes
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |