To wit:
RFC 218: my Dog $spot Is Just an Assertion I expect that a declaration of the form: my Dog $spot; is merely an assertion that you will not use $spot inconsistently with it being a Dog.
Later, he says that:
This bare declaration does not call a constructor; however, there may be forms of declaration that do.
Of course, they say "The Devil can quote Scripture for his own purposes."
In reply to Re: Fun with Typed Objects 1
by jkahn
in thread Fun with Typed Objects 1
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |