Yes, that is one huge line. When you run it, you notice that NS displays (on my browser) 4 elements. If you put a whitespace after the </nobr> tag for DDDDDD and refresh, you'll notice that IE has the whitespace added, but NS will show you the second line. Do it after IIIIII and you'll see all three lines.<html><head><title>Interesting bug</title></head> <body> <table width="300"> <tr> <td> <nobr><a href="">[AAAAAA]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[BBBB +BB]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[CCCCCC]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[D +DDDDD]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[EEEEEE]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="" +>[FFFFFF]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[GGGGGG]</a></nobr><nobr><a href +="">[HHHHHH]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[IIIIII]</a></nobr><nobr><a h +ref="">[JJJJJJ]</a></nobr><nobr><a href="">[KKKKKK]</a></nobr> </td> </tr> </table> </body> </html>
Furthermore, if you remove the <nobr> around AAAAAA, you'll notice that NS ignores the width specification for the <table> tag.
As soon as my account for Bugzilla activates, I will go ahead and report it to them.
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.
Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.
In reply to (OT) Bug found in NS that IE handles correctly by dragonchild
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |