Do you care to justify that with a some facts? I'd rather have a correct program that's slow than an incorrect program that's fast.
Coplan didn't say "this subroutine is slowing my program down". The question that Coplan was asking was a general question about efficiency. That's focusing on how fast the tires are turning and ignoring that you're about to crash. If, instead, I focus on whether or not my system is properly organized with minimal duplication of code and written in a clear, easy to read manner, then I can focus on what might be truly affecting my performance. Trying to improve the performance of a nested loop that ultimately only uses a half percent of the runtime is probably a poor utilization of resources. That is the real inefficiency.
Cheers,
Ovid
New address of my CGI Course.
Silence is Evil (feel free to copy and distribute widely - note copyright text)
In reply to Re(3)Module Efficiency (with a side order of facts, please)
by Ovid
in thread Module Efficiency
by Coplan
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |