Tell me, what would be the advantages of an all-controlling CPAN site?
A quality-control mechanism of some kind. Whether this is through authorized people reviewing the source code of modules or through some sort of module or author voting/ranking system. I'm aware CPAN isn't currently doing this, and it would involve a very large amount of work, but I believe it would prove advantageous.
Think of the current situation, do you conduct testing and thorough code reviews of every CPAN module you use? I do because I'm required to (and trust me, it sucks). This is a rather major problem facing large businesses wanting to use Perl. If you're wondering, oddly enough, my company's policy does not require I do this for core modules.
In reply to Re: Re: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI
by hacker
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |