Yes, maybe he is. Did I say otherwise? I said the question is if so.
That TheDamian's code would get shredded for not using strict alone is a pointless fact. I doubt a lot of people would be able to fully grok the stuff he does, let alone recreate it under strictures.
It's not a matter of whether code written by $X is good or bad; it's a matter of the probability of $X writing good code in relation to the probably of oneself writing good code.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^5: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI (fallibility)
by Aristotle
in thread Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI
by hacker
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |