It never says unique keys, so you can't assume key uniqueness.
Agreed, and my point goes further in that given that the spec doesnt specify how this should be handled, yet does contain an example that contains duplicate keys it seems reasonable to conclude that the spec meant to allow duplicate keys.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: URI.pm bug or am i missing something?
by demerphq
in thread URI.pm bug or am i missing something?
by jeffa
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |