No, No, NO! Symbolic references are not stupid, just extremely powerful. There are many perfectly smart reasons to use symbolic references. It just so happens that 99% of all of the actual usages are stupid.
Please note that I said symbolic references instead of real ones is legal, but stupid.. It's okay to use them if real references are not an alternative.
I did not say using symbolic references stupid no matter what. I use symbolic references in a lot of places. Just not where real references are usable.
Juerd
- http://juerd.nl/
- spamcollector_perlmonks@juerd.nl (do not use).
In reply to Re: Re6: How do I determine the underlying type of an Object?
by Juerd
in thread How do I determine the underlying type of an Object?
by jaa
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |