I know. Just teasing. But I did look at the original code quite closely, before I decided it was of the kind that merited what you describe as a blanket response. I came to that conclusion partly because the classic failure to deal with <img ...alt=">"> - that you mention - reveals a lack of acquaintance with the debate. For the record, I think gmpassos' code is rather good, as that sort of solution goes; certainly better than anything I managed before it was forcefully put to me that better mechanisms existed already. I should probably have said that, but I didn't really feel entitled to pass judgement on the quality, just the approach.
btw, I don't know if you've read the discussion i linked to in the first post. It will put this one in useful context.
In reply to Re5: Cleanning HTML - New/better module for that - test please! ;-P
by thpfft
in thread Cleanning HTML - New/better module for that - test please! ;-P
by gmpassos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |