Is there a way I can check the validity of all the subroutines in my perl program
Unfortunately no. Because subroutines can be called and created dynamically there's no way of telling at compile time whether every subroutine has been defined (which is potentially any subroutine). You could possibly do some trickery with the B:: modules to get some way towards your goal (i.e if you assume all subroutines and subroutines calls are static). And if you're dealing with methods then it'd be difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether every method exists due, in no small part, to inheritance
HTH

_________
broquaint

In reply to Re: Compile-time checking for undef subroutines? by broquaint
in thread Compile-time checking for undef subroutines? by mr.dunstan

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.