I don't see XHTML as being that drastic a departure from HTML that it needs to be separate. Right now, the current state of affairs has us treating most XHTML as stricter HTML. Perhaps as the semantic web picks up people will come up with other, better things to do with it and XHTML might a base for real, non-HTML-like activities. You said "does CPAN need an XHTML rootlevel namespace, or is XHTML simple a subet of HTML." I want to turn that statement on its head and see what the stress points are between XHTML and HTML and see if that leads us anywhere.

In reply to Re: RFC: New rootlevel CPAN namespace: XHTML by diotalevi
in thread RFC: New rootlevel CPAN namespace: XHTML by jeffa

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.