Did I say it shouldn't be discussed here? I just said I don't
see the point. Supposed 1000 people here say "yes, it does belong
there", and the modules list says "no", then what? Or 1000
people here say "no, it doesn't", the OP changes the name of
his package, and next week, someone else creates
XHTML::DancingSquirrels
and the modules list says "Cool, we finally have an XHTML rootlevel
namespace".
My point is that perlmonks doesn't control CPAN. CPAN does not
have an open forum to discuss which namespaces are "official",
but in practise, anything goes anyway, whether
blessed by the cabal or not.
So, I remain with my standpoint that I don't see the point of
discussing it. And note that the OP didn't ask "do you consider this a good
name for my module?", he specifically asked about whether that
toplevel namespace should be on CPAN.
Abigail
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.