Thanks for pointing out an alternate way to do this. I was not previously aware of the match-with-/g-in-list-context behavior, but it looks very useful.
Note: BrowserUk did show an example of this in our thread above, but I didn't really notice it until now. I guess it got lost in the noise (of my brain). :)
In reply to Re: Re: tokenize plain text messages
by revdiablo
in thread tokenize plain text messages
by revdiablo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |