I am just curious which methods people use for this very common problem and which is the most popular
Generally I'll just use a grep and double negation e.g
my @array = qw/ a list of words /; print "yep, it's there" if !!grep { $_ eq "of" } @array; __output__ yep, it's there
Nice and efficient in newer versions of perl (5.6.1+ ?) as it won't build a list IRC. Even quicker would be a simple regex
my @array = qw/ a list of words /; print "yep, it's there" if "of" =~ /\b (?: ${\join('|', @array) }) \b/x; __output__ yep, it's there
It's not quicker on it's own (list size etc will effect performance) but if you prebuild the word list it should be quicker than grepping every time.
HTH

_________
broquaint


In reply to Re: Checking a string's presence within an array. by broquaint
in thread Checking a string's presence within an array. by antirice

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.