for ( 0 .. $#{ $hash{$set}{data} } ) { $hash{$set}{min} = $hash{$set}{min} < $hash{$set}{data}[$_] ? $hash{$set}{min} : $hash{$set}{data}[$_]; }
I personally find the above solution easier to read. However, since this is in a loop, and regular ? : evaluates the data twice, your proposed operator could be considerably faster in some cases. Naturally, the premature optimization alarms are ringing here, so I'm going to stop typing now (:
----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
In reply to Re: Re: Re: A set of new operators. In keeping with the design of Perl?
by hardburn
in thread A set of new operators. In keeping with the design of Perl?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |