Certainly. To break down the original post:

Before you go any further with this

Comes across as very negative. Implies there's something very bad about Amazon that we and the OP should be aware of.

you should read Mark-Jason Dominus is Boycotting Amazon for a different view on Amazon.

Different view indeed, I agree. It's his opinion, as I stated in my reply, he's entitled to it. I don't see what it has to do with the OP's question, however. As I said, I think any boycott is a matter of personal preference, and as the OP said in his response, it's not relevent: he's doing this as a "survival strategy", rather than to achieve the moral high ground. The OP also fails to state any viewpoint for or against Amazon: he's simply trying to put together some scripting to make himself some money, so any attempts to counter his views are misplaced.

In the interest of balance, however, merlyn has a link to Amazon from his Perl Training page

Indeed.

so the boycott is obviously not universally adopted by those in the Perl community.

I'd agree. Looking through the responses to this post, it seems a fairly well-balanced split - so you could go as far as saying "some" of those in the Perl community support this boycott. Pointing out one person who disagrees, and then saying that it's "not univerally adopted" doesn't push the argument in either direction, and certainly doesn't balance the negativity of "Before you go any further": your argument still has a very strong implication of "Amazon is bad". If anything, "not universally adopted" simply implies that a minority disagree with your position (for example, like Windows isn't universally adopted because a minority of businesses choose to use Linux).

I think, in summary, that I read your post as being quite negative, when, in my opinion, there was no need for that negativity. If the OP was debating the morals of getting paid for sending customers to Amazon, then maybe it would have been justified. He was, however, asking a technical question in a technical forum, and hence objectively the moral implications are irrelevant. We regularly help people with email scripts capable of spamming millions of internet users every day, and yet questions are rarely raised over what it'll be used for, the morality of it, or boycotts of those posts planned.

While you personally disagree with Amazon's business practises, I don't think your post had any relevance to the OP's question or the subsequent discussion: it was simply off-topic.

-- Foxcub
#include www.liquidfusion.org.uk

In reply to Re[4]: (OT) Amazon web services - talk amongst yourselves by Tanalis
in thread Amazon web services - talk amongst yourselves by Stegalex

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.