I'm wondering why more people don't call subroutines with a single hash as the argument.

Most people don't write subroutines that take 61 arguments! :-) I've gotta wonder what that subroutine is doing, and whether it may be better to break it up into several subroutines that each do something small and specific.

That said, when you do have a fairly large number of subroutine arguments, I think passing them as named parameters in a hash is a fine idea, for the reasons you mentioned.

-- Mike

--
just,my${.02}

In reply to Re: passing subroutine args as a hash: why not? by thelenm
in thread passing subroutine args as a hash: why not? by Willard B. Trophy

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.