Often when searching pm for a solution I'll discover old nodes with old solutions (as well as new relevant nodes).

For example, searching for SoundEx I found a thread from 1999 (Approximate or Phonetic String-Matching) which didn't mention Text::Metaphone. I'd only discovered T::M from the same search at Re: comparing strings - better than soundex.

Should a good monk help his fellows by responding to the old discussion with updated information or a link to the newer discussion?
Or would it just be clutter, given they'll find it themselves?

A similar predicament occurs when I post a question on pm then some time later find code or read a mailing list discussion which addresses the same question.
Should a monk add links for others?

Brad

In reply to Updating and Linking Old Nodes by bsb

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.