I didn't want to write another module, simply because DateTime and Date::ICal are both well supported modules. If someone using my module wants reliable handling of dates then they are advised to install a reliable date handling module. Time::Local is the fallback simply because its in the Core.
Since yesterday I'm thinking along the same lines as Time::Local tests. If the user is happy with the boundaries set by Time::Local and localtime, then I don't really need tests that look beyond that. If they want to go beyond those boundaries then they should really install a more reliable date handling module.
I just found it infuriating having done all these tests and got it working on Linux, when I test it on Windows all these messages suddenly appeared. Such is life.
--
Barbie | Birmingham Perl Mongers | http://birmingham.pm.org/
In reply to Re: Re: Windows, Time::Local and dates before the epoch
by barbie
in thread Windows, Time::Local and dates before the epoch
by barbie
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |