I agree that OO is not only about flexibility. The main point for me is that the OO approach can match the "problem space/world" very closely. So it's mostly about modelling, the flexibility can come for free if the former was done "right" (for your favorite definition of right, i.e. there more than one way to do it ;-)
Just my 2 cents, -gjb-
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Multilevel flexibillity
by gjb
in thread Multilevel flexibillity
by zby
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |