If that is the question, then the answer is only partly. Your Windows scripts will be able to open documents and follow directories through the symbolic links just fine. However your Windows scripts can only access and manipulate the information available through the Windows filesystem, and since Windows filesystems have no concept of a symbolic link, the Unix system can't tell Windows about them, and if you try to tell Windows to tell Unix to create one, you will just confuse Windows.
In other words, Windows is the weakest link. The only things you can communicate between your script and Unix are things that Windows can understand. Windows can understand files and directories, but not symbolic links, so Windows sees symbolic links as regular files and directories.
(Note that this goes the other way as well, for instance from Unix you cannot manipulate some of the Windows file permissioning attributes simply because Windows NT/2000/XP supports some concepts that Unix does not understand.)
In reply to Re: soft links
by tilly
in thread soft links
by moked
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |