Yikes, I didn't notice that. I was looking around in Mail::Audit's code, but didn't notice the weird constructor. Thanks for pointing this out. Incidentally, has anyone got any idea why Mr. Cozens would choose to make his constructor like this?
In reply to Re: Re: Overriding Mail::Audit's accept()
by revdiablo
in thread Overriding Mail::Audit's accept()
by revdiablo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |