However, the risk of repetition is more than outweighed by the new risk of predictability, especially using time and a process ID (yes, some smarter OS's have non-sequential PIDs). I do not think the issue of repetition is much of a risk. In the example the original poster used, the chance of a repetition is about 1 in 10^31. I'll take those odds any day. :)
In reply to RE: RE: Randomizing Unique ID?
by turnstep
in thread Randomizing Unique ID?
by Martin A
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |