Thanks for taking the time to actually read through my stuff.
The "dry, academic approach" of the paper is easily explained. If you want to engage in dialogue with your academic peers (and supervisors... in my case) via writing you normally try to use the code of your trade, don't you? Especially if you try to express some thoughts and concepts that deviate from the mainstream in particular ways. So... I guess it is all about purpose.
I certainly agree that writing for a more diverse audience would require a different approach... and that there is still a lot of room for improvement in my English writing skills.
I strongly disagree that any knowledge can be "transmitted" efficiently...
A sort of summary of the article is available in form of a presentation that I did at the BlogTalk conference. (http://static.cognitivearchitects.com/gems/Seblogging/ConversationalLearningTool.ppt)
I would also be happy to answer further questions or reply to your comments over at http://seblogging.cognitivearchitects.com/discuss/msgReader$964
Greetings
Sebastian
In reply to Re: Re: Designing conversational learning environments with personal Webpublishing practices and technologies
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Designing conversational learning environments with personal Webpublishing practices and technologies
by zby
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |