Thanks for taking the time to actually read through my stuff.
Sorry, I can't read all of everything ever written. Sometimes I have to set priorities and evaluate essays before I read them in entirety.
The "dry, academic approach" of the paper is easily explained.
You'll have to forgive me here, I was never much of a fan of said approach in any context. Different target audiences I guess, but nevertheless I think it would have been made much more useful to this site's visitors if a summary in a different form had been provided (which is obviously not required from you, but rather from the poster).
I strongly disagree that any knowledge can be "transmitted" efficiently...
All depends on your definition of efficiency and the mode of transmission. I think we have plenty of room to improve :).
Anyways, sorry if the first post sounded like a flame, it was meant to be constructive. Thanks for making the article and presentation available :)
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Designing conversational learning environments with personal Webpublishing practices and technologies
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Designing conversational learning environments with personal Webpublishing practices and technologies
by zby
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |