That wouldn't give much useful statistics. It would at best
give some measure of popularity, but not at all at usefulness.
Some problems: there's no way to count how often the modules
are used in programs, as programs are hardly uploaded to CPAN.
You'd just count how often other modules use them. Furthermore, it would show a strong bias in favour of modules
that don't have alternatives. For instance DBI. There isn't
a module that does something similar, so the DBI would get
high marks, even if the code itself is shitty.
I wouldn't bother going to a site that ranks CPAN modules
based on a popularity vote. After all, Windows isn't ten
times better than Unix as an OS, is it? But that would be
the outcome if you'd let people vote.
I would value a site that does reviews of modules. Non-anonymous reviews, so a reviewer can establish a name
for him/herself. Some monks are already exploring this idea
after a similar discussion last week.
Abigail
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.