It' not more efficient for the hardware or the network. When you walk an SNMP table, you do it by retriving the first value, then sending a get_next over and over until a value is received that isn't in the table. So however many entries are in the table, you've sent that many requests and received that many responses.
Update: If your're using other than v1 of SNMP, what I sadi above may be untrue.
--Bob Niederman, http://bob-n.comIn reply to Re: Net::SNMP method efficiency
by bobn
in thread Net::SNMP method efficiency
by LazerRed
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |