Is there any particular reason tha you aren't using an array rather than a hash? With contiguous numeric keys, there using an array is slighly more efficient to reference, but best of all, you don't need to sort anything to iterate them in numeric sequence.
In reply to Re: Numerical sorting issues with a hash of hashes
by BrowserUk
in thread Numerical sorting issues with a hash of hashes
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |