As said by others, a good interesting homework question, be it from someone at school or at work, benefits other readers as well. A cheater won't get far in technical profession anyway (it's another story with other professions) and should the person a "cheater" actually learn something and apply the knowledge to do something useful in life, that's only a win-win situation for us. So, we might as well keep and even answer the good homework question for the sake of competent learners.
Besides, the responsibility of catching a cheater lays squarely on the teacher at school and the school system. At least, it should be obvious to catch some with great performance discrepancy between take-home assignment and in-class exam or any kind of in-person quiz.
(That reminded me a post a while ago that told an anecdote where a job interviewee claimed to be chromatic but failed to explain most of "his" own code, let alone the fact that many people do know who chromatic is.)
__________________
Update: I slipped my mind. Thanks blue_cowdawg for reminding me. I forgot how many phony consultants I've encountered and forgot some people don't actually have to do work for professional advancement, just cunningly claiming credit.
Update: The anecdote mentioned above came from Re: CPAN Authorhood
In reply to Re: Homework threads aren't necessarily evil
by chunlou
in thread Homework threads aren't necessarily evil
by dragonchild
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |