Thanks for helping clarify my problem. I want to find the set of discrete hits that gives me the best coverage (if that make sense?).
In your example above (ah the beauty of acsii graphics) I would like to pick the two shorter examples as combined they give me a higher overall coverage.
I apologise for any confusion that I am causing - I am having a bad day - too hot and sticky in here!
A.A.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Comparing 2-D co-ordinates
by aging acolyte
in thread Comparing 2-D co-ordinates
by aging acolyte
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |