If I've done it before, then my estimate of time will be nearly 100 percent accurate. If I've never done anything remotely like it then my time estimate will be a wild-eyed guess. If between these two extremes, scale the reliability of my estimate accordingly.Roughly translated to your situation, a 'good' number of lines coded must also be based on a sliding scale, typically related to the amount of experience you have on similar projects. More to the point on some projects, 50 lines might be a near super-human performance, so there is no hard and fast rule here. The good news is that lines of code as a metric is at least bounded, zero on one end and some largish number on the other (human limits and all that)!
--hsm
"Never try to teach a pig to sing...it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."In reply to Re: (OT) Proving Productivity?
by hsmyers
in thread (OT) Proving Productivity?
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |