The statement of the problem is flawed. Since @numbers is sorted numerically, @small = sort {$a <=> $b } @small should be sufficient.
Unfortunately, his statement of what @small should be doens't seem to match the problem statement, in that @small actually contains 80.9, but what he says @small should be does *not* contain 80.9 - what are we to make of that?
Anyhow, if we assum that @small is a subset of @numbers, which the AM wants ordered the same way as @numbers, and for some reason, sort() is not the solution, the following would seem to work for any ordering for @numbers.my @numbers = qw(76.8 77.0 77.2 77.4 77.6 77.8 78.0 78.2 78.4 78.6 78.8 79.0 79.2 79.4 79.6 79.8 80.0 80.2 80.5 80.7 80.9 81.1); my @small = qw(78.6 78.8 79.0 80.9 77.0); $s{$_}++ for @small; @ordered_small = grep { exists $s{$_} } @numbers; # demo code below: print "@ordered_small\n"; @numbers = reverse @numbers; @ordered_small = grep { exists $s{$_} } @numbers; print "@ordered_small\n";
Update: On closer reading, the problem statement is hopeless. How are the numbers in small "selected", and what makes the first or last (or any other) number in @small "wrong"?
--Bob Niederman, http://bob-n.comIn reply to Re: Array logic!
by bobn
in thread Array logic!
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |