Newcomers don't have very many votes. You can already order replies by reputation. Reputation doesn't correspond to technical correctness. Reputation can change at any point, as you can vote on nodes that are almost four years old at this point.
The best way to judge a node's content is to see if it works. Nothing will ever change that.
I personally lean toward hiding the reputation of someone else's node even after you've voted on it. It's a nearly-meaningless number. Giving people yet another thing to argue about seems wrong.
In reply to Re: A case for neutral votes
by chromatic
in thread A case for neutral votes
by dws
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |