Mails tend to have a single "Re:" with no indication of depth.
Of course you are right. I just seem to be living in the past. I did a little zgrep'ing on my archives and found many more occurences of multiple "re"s from 1996 then in more recent years. And, it was worse; there were all sorts of ugly combos of "Re" and "RE" and even a couple with "re".
*shrug* So, those long strings of "Re"s look rather normal to me. What can I say?
-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
In reply to Re: Re^2: Automatic Re-ing with numbers
by sauoq
in thread Automatic Re-ing with numbers
by liz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |