No, no. If you are going to troll, you are supposed to compare me to Hilter not Machievelli. The more I try to compose a reply, the less I think your sentiment is serious.
Unless the node author is not a member, then the values I'm talking about apply to them as well. (And if they aren't a member, then anything to do with experience/reputation doesn't much apply to them anyway.)
So I have no desire to *encourage* it. I see value in allowing it.
I didn't discuss the reasons I see value in it (and I won't now). I was only discussing why I think it is a misktake to encourage it.
- tyeIn reply to Re^6: A case for neutral votes (+/-)
by tye
in thread A case for neutral votes
by dws
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |