Gentle Monks, sweet purveyors of wisdom...

I'm trying to optimize a subroutine which uses up more than 40% of my code's runtime. I thought that using a regexp to split a line of data would be faster than calling split(), but it doesn't seem to work that way.

Here's the split:
my ($p, $l, $o, $g, $s) = split( /\s+/, $lsl );
and here's the regexp:

my ($p, $l, $o, $g, $s) = ($lsl =~ /^(.*?)\s+(.*?)\s+(.*?)\s+(.*?)\s+(.*)$/);
To further slow things down, in both subroutines the value of $lsl is gotten by the following:
my $lsl = `ls -l "$fnm" 2>&1`;
I need all the info provided by that line, but is there a quicker way to get it?

I'm still something of a novice, so perhaps I did something unperlish. I'd appreciate any thoughts or suggestions.

Thanks!

In reply to Which witch is the quicker witch? by Dismas

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.