A better solution would be something that gets reset automatically by the operating system even if the process stops dead in its tracks. I give an "only-one" solution in my "highlander" column, which could be extended to "only six" with a bit of cleverness. In fact, I have that bit of cleverness scheduled for a future column idea. {grin}
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
In reply to •Re: Re: Maximum # of concurrent runs
by merlyn
in thread Maximum # of concurrent runs
by warthurton
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |