If your code is as simple as the sample you presented (three substitutions), then I believe your original style is probably faster and much clearer than the other alternatives proposed.
If you actually have dozens of substitutions to make, then I think it may be worth trying out one of the abstractions offered, though performance should be tested if it is a possible concern.
-- Eric Hammond
In reply to Re: Re: Re: multiple (different) substitutions on same $foo
by esh
in thread multiple (different) substitutions on same $foo
by jonnyfolk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |